The Impact and Efficiency of Electronic Libraries In Various Districts of Punjab, Pakistan

Ehsan Bhutta, Yasir Rasool, Chaudhry Abdul Rehman


The present research study is conducted with the aim to assess and analyze the impact of electronic libraries (EL) by using usability criteria which include consistency, efficiency, learning and satisfaction in digital learning and reading stimulus among the general public and youth in specific. The structural equation modeling (SEM) of variables like effectiveness (EEF), efficiency (EFT), learning ability (LER) and performance & satisfaction (PES) was followed by research design. Survey was conducted in divisional headquarters of the Punjab province to collect data. The population was N=270 persons from 9 out of 20 districts having EL facilities. The findings revealed that E-Libraries have a positive correlation between productivity, effectiveness, learning and success. Performance, efficacy and learning capacity had a substantial and positive influence on user’s satisfaction. The study found that the provision of a conducive atmosphere that ensures productivity, effectiveness and learning capacity plays a vital role in enhancing performance of EL. It is proposed that we follow more efficient and dynamic methods in order to support the concept of EL for promotion of culture of digital learning philosophy among the public.

Full Text:



Abuzaid, R.A. & Singh, D. (2009). A framework for e-library services to support the e-learning environment in a secondary school: A case study, Paper presented at the 36th Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship, July 16-20, 2007, in Taipei,Taiwan

Abuzaid, R. A. (2005). Preparation and training of employees in information technology field in the university libraries and information centers in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Masters dissertation, Jeddah: King Abdul Aziz University.

Babin, B.J., Griffin, M. and Hair, J.F. (2016). Heresies and sacred cows in scholarly marketing publications, Journal of Business Research, 69 (8), 3133-3138.

Bhutta,E.,Kausar,S.,&Rehman,Abdul,.(2020).Mediation Analysis of Factors Affecting the Performance of Public Schools at Early Childhood Level in Punjab, Pakistan,Pakistan Journal of Education 36 (3), 187-210.

Blandford, A. & Buchanan, G. (2003). Usability of digital libraries: A source of creative tensions with technical developments. TCDL Bulletin. Retrieved June 12, 2020 from:

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information systems research, 14(2), 189-217.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., Lawrence Erlbaum, New York, NY.

e-Libraries Webpage,

Fuhr, N., Tsakonas, G., Aalberg, T., Agosti, M., Hansen, P., Kapidakis, S., Sølvberg, I.(2007),: Evaluation of digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries 8(1), 21–38.

Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2015). “A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 115-135.

International Standard Organization (ISO) (1997). International Standard Organization, Geneva, “ISO 9241-11: Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs)”, Part 11: Guidance on Usability Specification and Measures, technical report.

Jie, S., & Bao-Zhong, Y. (2012). Development and Characteristic of Digital Library as a Library Branch. 2012 International Conference on Future Computer Supported Education, Elsevier, Science Direct, IERI Procedia 2 (2012) 12 – 17.

Jeng, J. (2005). Usability Assessment of Academic Digital Libraries: Effectiveness, Efficiency, Satisfaction, and Learnability. LIBRI, 55, 96–121

Karim, R. A., & Shakil, A. F. (2017). A research study about the importance of e library for globalized learning among students at university level in Karachi, Pakistan. RADS Journal of Social Sciencess & Business Management, 4(2), 104-114.

Karoulis, A., and Pombortsis, A. (2003). Heuristic evaluation of Web-based ODL programs. In Usability evaluation of online learning programs, ed. Claude Ghaoui, 88–109. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.

Keralapura, M. (2009). Technology and customer expectation in academic libraries: A special reference to technical/management libraries in Karnao. Surveying scholataka. The International Information & Library Review, 41, 184-195.

Marchionini, G. (2000). Evaluation digital libraries: A longitudinal and multifaceted view. Library Trends, 49, 304–333.

Nielson, J. (1993). Usability Engineering, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA.

Onwuchekwa, E.O., & Jegede, O.R. (2011). Information Retrieval Methods in Libraries and Information Centers. An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 5 (23), 27-35

Richter, N.F., Sinkovics, R.R., Ringle, C.M. and Schlägel, C. (2016). “A critical look at the use of SEM in international business research”, International Marketing Review, 33 (3), 376-404.

Joo, S., & Lee, J.Y. (2011)."Measuring the usability of academic digital libraries: Instrument development and validation", The Electronic Library, 29 (4), 523 – 537.

Tenopir, C. (2003). Use and users of electronic library resources: an overview and analysis of recent research studies. Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington, D.C.

Waqas, M., Rehman, M., Rehman, A. (2019). The Barriers and Challenges Faced by Private Sector Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Promoting Sustainable Development: A Qualitative Inquiry in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Education, 36 (1).

Xie, H. I. (2008), “Users’ evaluation of digital libraries (DLs): their uses, their criteria, and their assessment”, Information Process & Management, 44 (3), 1346-73



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Maintained by: Software Section, Directorate of ICT