A Study on Teacher’s Perception about Components of English Handwriting in Pakistan

Hafiz Tahir Jameel, Farhan Sarwar, Beverly H. Moskowitz

Abstract


Handwriting is an essential of school activities for the school going children. Good or legible handwriting remained a constant task for the teachers and students during the whole day. The teachers recognize the legible handwriting at a gland due to their routine work in the schools. The teacher’s criterion that lies behind their decision of good handwriting was a question to answer in this study. The purpose of this study was to identify the components of legibility from the teachers’ perspective. Referencing handwriting experts and a literature review, key variables were categorized and organized onto a 5-point Likert Scale questionnaire. Teachers’ responses to the various legibility criteria were then tallied with regards to primary school students. Mean, standard deviation, exploratory factor analysis and path diagram statistics were applied to the ordinal data. It was concluded that twelve components were important for the legibility of handwriting of primary school students. These include Readability, Margin, Similarity, Line, Space, Size, Shape, Roundness, Form, Slant, Alignment and Recognition.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ang, R. P., & Huan, V. S. (2006). Academic expectations stress inventory development, factor analysis, reliability, and validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 522-539.

Cattell, R. B. (1988). The meaning and strategic use of factor analysis. In Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 131-203): Springer.

Child, D. (2006). The essentials of factor analysis: A&C Black.

Cizek, G. (2004). Review of the Test of Legible Handwriting. Mental Measurements Yearbook, 11.

Cramer, D. (2003). Advanced quantitative data analysis: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Cutler, L., & Graham, S. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 907-919.

Diekema, S. M., Deitz, J., & Amundson, S. J. (1998). Test–retest reliability of the evaluation tool of children’s handwriting-manuscript. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52(4), 248-255.

Feder, K. P., & Majnemer, A. (2007). Handwriting development, competency, and intervention. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 49(4), 312-317.

Friel, C. M. (2007). Notes on factor analysis. Criminal Justice Center, Sam Houston State University.

Graham, S. (1986). A review of handwriting scales and factors that contribute to variability in handwriting scores. Journal of School Psychology, 24(1), 63-71.

Graham, S., Berninger, V., Weintraub, N., & Schafer, W. (1998). Development of handwriting speed and legibility in grades 1–9. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(1), 42-52.

Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Improving the writing performance of young struggling writers theoretical and programmatic research from the center on accelerating student learning. The journal of special education, 39(1), 19-33.

Graham, S., Struck, M., Santoro, J., & Berninger, V. W. (2006). Dimensions of good and poor handwriting legibility in first and second graders: Motor programs, visual–spatial arrangement, and letter formation parameter setting. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29(1), 43-60.

Gregg, N., & Mather, N. (2002). School Is Fun at Recess Informal Analyses of Written Language for Students with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(1), 7-22.

Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.

Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement.

Kerlinger, F. N. (1984). Liberalism and conservatism: The nature and structure of social attitudes (Vol. 1): Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Incorporated.

Larsen, S., & Hammill, D. (1989). Test of legible handwriting. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

Peverly, S. T. (2006). The importance of handwriting speed in adult writing. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29(1), 197-216.

Pollock, N., Lockhart, J., Blowes, B., Semple, K., Webster, M., & Farhat, L. (2009). Handwriting assessment protocol. In: Hamilton: CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University.

Revelle, W. (2015). An overview of the psych package.

Rosenblum, S. (2008). Development, reliability, and validity of the Handwriting Proficiency Screening Questionnaire (HPSQ). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(3), 298-307.

Rosenblum, S., Parush, S., & Weiss, P. L. (2003). Computerized temporal handwriting characteristics of proficient and non-proficient handwriters. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(2), 129-138.

Schneck, C., Amundson, S., Case-Smith, J., & O’Brien, J. (2010). Prewriting and handwriting skills. Occupational therapy for children, 6, 555-580.

Stevens, J. P. (2012). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences: Routledge.

Sudsawad, P., Trombly, C. A., Henderson, A., & Tickle-Degnen, L. (2001). The relationship between the Evaluation Tool of Children’s Handwriting and teachers’ perceptions of handwriting legibility. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(5), 518-523.

Volman, M., van Schendel, B. M., & Jongmans, M. J. (2006). Handwriting difficulties in primary school children: A search for underlying mechanisms. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60(4), 451-460.

Yakimishyn, J. E., & Magill-Evans, J. (2002). Comparisons among tools, surface orientation, and pencil grasp for children 23 months of age. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(5), 564-572.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30971/pje.v37i2.1137

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Maintained by: Software Section, Directorate of ICT