Effect of Modular Approach Teaching on Achievement of Secondary School Mathematics Students

Umaira Khalil, Muhammad Imran Yousuf


Advancement in teaching techniques has become an essential issue in education. The study ascertains the effects of the modular approach teaching in mathematics for secondary school students. Modules are developed and used by teachers teaching plans by reflecting the skills, abilities and related information in respective unit speaking Current study targeted the module development for teaching of mathematics at grade 10th and to give a comparison between the academic achievement of control & experimental groups treated through traditional & modular approach. The research was conducted by designing an experiment and was based on modules. The targeted population was the grade 10th students. Pre & post-tests were conducted after treatment and a significant difference was found in scores of the two groups. Scores of the experimental group were found higher than the control group. The originality value of the study explores the essential vital role that modules can play in mathematics teaching and how we can use modules to enhance the creative challenges that lead to an improvement in mathematics comprehension and make it valid for every stage of learning.

Full Text:



Adibnia, A. (2010). Advance teaching methods. Isfahan, Iran: Kankash Publication.

Ajaib, A., & Yousaf, I. (2018). Comparative study on university teachers’ attitude towards weak and bright students. University of Wah Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 23-39.

Ansari, M. & Maryam, M. (2000). The effect of metacognitive strategies on academic achievement and self-control of girl students in biology text book of first grade of high school [Master’s thesis]. Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran.

Aqazade, M. (2009). Guidance to new teaching methods. Tehran, Iran: Ayij Publication.

Aquino, G. V. (2008). Effective teaching (3rd ed.) Manila, Philippines: National Book Store, lnc.

Australian Curriculum Studies Association (2001). Curriculum development, evaluation and theory. Curriculum Perspectives, 21(4), 1-20.

Bedaure, A. A. (2012). Modular instruction in Biology, its effect on student’s performance. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research, 9, 284-304.

Biggs, B. (1994). Student learning research and theory: Where do we currently stand? Headington, England. Oxford Centre, Staff Development.

Collette, C. (1986). Science instruction in the middle & secondary school. Ohio, OH. Merrill Publications Co.

Cross, K. P. (1996). Improving teaching and learning through classroom assessment and classroom research. In: G. Gibbs, (Eds.), Improving Student Learning: Using research to Improve Student Learning (pp. 3-11). London, England: Oxford Centre, Staff Development.

Grouws, D. A. (1999). Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, Shanghai, China: Education Press. (pp. 356-382).

Khan, S. A., Arif, M. H., & Yousuf, M. I. (2019). A study of learning preferences in the light of Dunn and Dunn model. Bulletin of Education and Research. 41(1), 17-32.

Lateef, A., Dahar, M. A., & Yousuf, M. I. (2019). Influence of type A and type B personality on academic achievement of university students. Global Social Sciences Review (GSSR), 4(2), 109-118.

Malik, S. K. (2012). Effects of modular and traditional approaches on student’s general comprehension. Elixir Social Studies, 42, 6228-6231.

Padmapriya, D. (2015). Effectiveness of self-learning modules on achievements in Biology among secondary school students. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research, 4(2), 44-46.

Pareek, U. & Rao. T. V. (1981). A handbook for trainers in educational management. Bangkok, Thailand: UNESCO Regional Office for Education in Asia and the Pacific.

Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioural Science, 28(1), 4-13.

Remillard, J. T. & Bryans, M. B. (2004). Teacher’s orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 352-388.

Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teacher’s use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.

Sejpal, K. (2013). Modular method of teaching. Jasdan, India: Haribapa Arts and Commerce College.

Singley, M. K. & Anderson, J. R. (1989). Transfer of cognitive skill. Cambridge, England: Harvard University Press.

Skovsmose, O. (2005). Travelling through education: Uncertainty, mathematics, responsibility. Rotterdam, Netherland: Sense Publishers.

Sombilon, S. G. (2011). Instructional material: How to develop and validate. Malaybalay, Philippines: Bunkindon State University.

Stiggins, R. & Chappuis, J. (2005). Using student-involved classroom assessment to close achievement gaps. Theory into Practice, 44(1), 11-18.

UNESCO. (2005). Education for All global monitoring report: The quality imperative. Paris, France: UNESCO.

Yadav, M. S. (1992). Teaching of science. New Delhi, India: Anmol Publication.

Yousuf, M. I. & Imran, M. (2018). Teachers and parents’ perceptions about learning abilities and skills among children at Montessori classes. Journal of Elementary Education, 28(1), 87-97.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Maintained By: Hatib Shabbir, Directorate Of ICT, AIOU