Relationship Between Various Forms of Interaction and Students’ Satisfaction in Online Learning: Case of an Open University of Pakistan

Saleha Ali, Munawar Sultana Mirza

Abstract


Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the relationship between the level of various forms of interaction among its key players and students’ satisfaction in online setting. The level of interaction was measured following Moore’s model of interaction between student and tutor, among students, and of students with content (1973). The quantitative descriptive survey was used to conduct this study using a self-tailored questionnaire. The population of the study comprised all male and female students enrolled in Bachelors’ degree programs of the Department of Education in Spring 2018 and Fall 2018 at a virtual university in Pakistan (N=1049). All students enrolled in 4-years’ B.Ed. Elementary, 1.5 years B.Ed. Secondary, 2.5 years B.Ed. Elementary and M. Ed. were included as sample of the study. The overall level of interaction was slightly above the midpoint on the scale. As expected, the learner-content interaction was the highest and interaction among learners was the lowest. Significant correlation was found between the level of interaction and satisfaction with the online learning mode. The findings suggest that the institutions should take necessary measures to enhance and expand the three types of interaction presented by Moore and investigated in this study.

Key Words: Interaction, online learning environment, students’ satisfaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 4(2).

Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with internet-based MBA courses. Journal of management education, 24(1), 32-54.

Arbaugh, J. B., & Rau, B. L. (2007). A study of disciplinary, structural, and behavioral effects on course outcomes in online MBA courses. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5(1), 65-95.

Avgeriou, P., Papasalouros, A., Retalis, S., & Skordalakis, M. (2003). Towards a pattern language for learning management systems. Journal of educational technology & society, 6(2), 11-24.

Baker, K. (1986). Dilemmas at a distance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 11(3):219-230

Biner, P. M., Dean, R. S., & Mellinger, A. E. (1994). Factors underlying distance learner satisfaction with televised college-level courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), 60-71.

Bolliger, D. U. & Wasilik, O. (2009). Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education. Distance Education, 30(1), 103-116.

Bolliger, D.U. (2004). Key Factors for Determining Student Satisfaction in Online Courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 61-67.

Chejlyk, S. (2006). The effects of online course format and three components of student perceived interactions on overall course satisfaction (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University).

Croxton, R. A. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. Merlot Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 314-325.

Drennan, J., Kennedy, J., & Pisarski, A. (2005). Factors affecting student attitudes toward flexible online learning in management education. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(6), 331-338.

Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The Determinants of Students' Perceived Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in University Online Education: An Empirical Investigation*. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215-235.

Erdil, K. M. (2007). Student Support Services and Student Satisfaction in Online Education. Paper presented at the International Educational Technology (IETC) Conference (7th Nicosia, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus).

Galusha, J. M. (1997). Barriers to Learning in Distance Education. Interpersonal Computing and Technology Journal, 5(3), 6-14.

Gosmire, D., Morrison, M., & Van Osdel, J. (2009). Perceptions of interactions in online courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 609-617.

Grandzol, C. J., & Grandzol, J. R. (2010). Interaction in online courses: More is not always better. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(2), 1-18.

Gunawardena, C. N., Linder-VanBerschot, J. A., LaPointe, D. K., & Rao, L. (2010). Predictors of learner= satisfaction and transfer of learning in a corporate online education program. The Amer. Jrnl. of Distance Education, 24(4), 207-226.

Hall, J. C. (2001). Retention and wastage in FE and HE. The Scottish Council for Research in Education,

Hara, N., & Kling, R. (2001). Student distress in web-based distance education. Educause Quarterly, 24(3), 68-69.

Hollenbeck, C. R., Mason, C. H., & Song, J. H. (2011). Enhancing student learning in marketing courses: An exploration of fundamental principles for website platforms. Journal of Marketing Education, 33(2), 171-182.

Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause quarterly, 31(4), 51-55.

Jonassen, D. H. (2004). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Taylor & Francis.

Joyner, S. A., Fuller, M. B., Holzweiss, P. C., Henderson, S., & Young, R. (2014). The Importance of Student-Instructor Connections in Graduate Level Online Courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 10(3), 436-445.

Kear, K., Williams, J., Seaton, R., & Einon, G. (2004). Using information and communication technology in a modular distance learning course. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(1), 17-25.

Kim, K. S., & Moore, J. (2005). Web–based learning: Factors affecting students’ satisfaction and learning experience. First Monday, 10(11).

Kruger, K. (2000). Using information technology to create communities of learners. In B. Jacoby (Ed.), Involving commuter students in learning, New Directions for Higher Education, (pp. 59 70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16-39.

Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Moore, M. G. (1973). Toward a theory of independent learning and teaching. The Journal of Higher Education, 44(9), 661-679.

Naaj, M. A., Nachouki, M., & Ankit, A. (2012). Evaluating student satisfaction with blended learning in a gender-segregated environment. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11(1), 185 200.

Nir-Gal, O. (2002). Distance Learning: The Role of the Teacher in a Virtual Learning Environment. Ma’of u-Ma’aseh, 8, 23-50.

Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. John Wiley & Sons.

Payne, A., & Hamzaee, R. G. (2011). An empirical analysis of student satisfaction influential factors in online learning. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 2(1), 37-52.

Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous learning networks, 6(1), 21-40.

Pintrich, P. R., Garcia, T., McKeachie, W. J., & Smith, D. A. (1991). Motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Regents of the University of Michigan.

Rothman, T., Romeo, L., Brennan, M., & Mitchell, D. (2011). Criteria for assessing student satisfaction with online courses. International Journal for e-Learning Security, 1(1-2), 27-32.

Sampson, P. M., Leonard, J., Ballenger, J. W., & Coleman, J. C. (2010). Student satisfaction of online courses for educational leadership. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(3).

Schar, S. G., & Krueger, H. (2000). Using new learning technologies with multimedia. IEEE multimedia, 7(3), 40-51.

Sher, A. (2009). Assessing the relationship of student-instructor and student-student interaction to student learning and satisfaction in web-based online learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 102-120.

Sorensen, C., & Baylen, D. M. (1999). Interaction in interactive television instruction: Perception or reality. In Conference of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Montreal, Canada.

Su, B., Bonk, C. J., Magjuka, R. J., Liu, X., & Lee, S. H. (2005). The importance of interaction in web-based education: A program-level case study of online MBA courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(1), 1-19.

Sutton, L. (2001). The principles of vicarious interaction in computer-mediated communications. Journal of Interactive Educational Communications, 7(3), 223-242.

Swan, K., Shea, P., Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Pelz, W., & Maher, G. (2000). Building knowledge building communities: Consistency, contact and communication in the virtual classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(4), 359-383.

Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance education, 22(2), 306-331.

Thurmond, V., & Wambach, K. (2004). Understanding interactions in distance education: A review of the literature. International journal of instructional technology and distance learning, 1(1).

Verduin, J. R., & Clark, T. A. (1991). Distance education: The foundations of effective practice. Jossey Bass Inc Pub.

Young, A., & Norgard, C. (2006). Assessing the quality of online courses from the students' perspective. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(2), 107-115.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Maintained By: sabir.khan, Directorate Of ICT, AIOU