Developing Learning Environment Using Interactive Multimedia

Muhammad Shahzad, Muhammad Asif Nadeem, Zaib U-Nisa

Abstract


The study was conducted in three phases that is testing, using multimedia and observation of the controlled group. Major objective of the research were to assess the implications of software development design on learners and to identify effects of interactive multimedia environment on learning patterns of learners’ at graduate level. The researchers followed experimental design of research and selected a group of six learners from social science departments through purposive sampling technique. Researchers observed and interviewed the sampled learners who used LMS software. The analysis was made to find out results of patterns of multimedia interactions. It was found that in controlled environmental situations, the learners effectively learned by using interactive multimedia. Learners’ capacity of learning was developed when they were given freedom to use variety of learning strategies. These learning strategies were based on the ability and cognition of individual learner. It was also found that the interface design also facilitated exploration as well as, provided guidance to make choices. Learners used concept maps as an important tool which helped them in their structured learning. The research concluded that capabilities of the learners may be evoked through nodes, internal motivation and use of innovative learning techniques.

Keywords: Multimedia; learning environment; interactive
multimedia environment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amble, J. C. (2012). Combating terrorism in the new media

environment. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 35(5), 339-353.

Aslam, W., Soban, M., Akhtar, F., & Zaffar, N. A. (2015). Smart meters

for industrial energy conservation and efficiency optimization in

Pakistan: Scope, technology and applications. Renewable and

Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 933-943.

Bozer, G., Levin, L., & Santora, J. C. (2017). Succession in family

business: multi-source perspectives. Journal of Small Business and

Enterprise Development, 24(4), 753-774.

Cerezo, R., Sánchez-Santillán, M., Paule-Ruiz, M. P., & Núñez, J. C.

(2016). Students' LMS interaction patterns and their relationship with

achievement: A case study in higher education. Computers &

Education, 96, 42-54.

Chen, C.-H., Chou, Y.-Y., & Huang, C.-Y. (2016). An augmentedreality-based concept map to support mobile learning for science.

The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(4), 567-578.

Czaja, S. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., & Rogers, W. A. (2019).

Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors

approaches. Boca Raton: CRC press.

Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2012). How can conceptual change

contribute to theory and practice in science education? Second

international handbook of science education (pp. 107-118).

Dordrecht: Springer.

Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X.

(2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A metaanalysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90-

Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A

measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of

Educational Research, 98(3), 184-192.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Maintained By: sabir.khan, Directorate Of ICT, AIOU